Don’t Force Our Veterans To Seek Help

A war memorial is “intended to remind us of those who served and died as a result of war.” The phrase “as a result of the war” is relevant because, sadly and shockingly, many return home after the war to find themselves in yet another battle, this time with the Department of Veterans Affairs, commit suicide out of desperation (“This would always trigger him ‘: in trouble when a veteran calls’, November 14). Their loved ones do not need a memorial to remind them of the loss that will stay with them forever. How offensive it must be to learn that there are plans to spend an additional $ 500 million on the fully adequate Canberra War Memorial. Surely that money and that commitment would be better spent on the rehabilitation of returning military personnel. They did their job. Don’t make them ask for help. Shame. Kathleen Hollins, Northmead

Devilish dilemma

It’s not often that I find myself on the same side of the ledger as Parnell Palme McGuinness, but on assisted dying legislation we are aligned (“Euthanasia Needs Devil’s Advocate,” November 14). To overcome the potential systemic bias of approval by compliant physicians, legislation should mandate an impartial and appropriately qualified counter-argument lawyer, such as a retired judge, to forcefully present the case to each family. and to their coordinating practitioner before any decision to end a life is considered. David Beins, Cooks Hill

McGuinness says we need devil’s advocate to balance the proposed VAD bill. I am also in favor of distance selling, but as she points out, there is a lack of “friction in the process” of this bill and therefore a real blind spot in the passionate push for legislation, however well-meaning it is. she. Despite all the conservative safeguards, we need more teeth in this area, to reduce the smoothness of the road by ensuring an adequate balance in exploratory options before legislation. One is a mandatory consultation with palliative care experts without an outcome agenda, only that the opportunity is given to explore the situation in a complex way in a safe and experienced environment. And do not forget that it remains a choice if we decide to use the means, if we give the right. It is not mandatory. Judy Finch, Cedar Feast

Subsidize laziness

Andrew Forrest points out that our federal government’s diesel fuel rebate costs Australia $ 7 billion per year and will grow to over $ 10 billion per year by 2025 (“Forrest can see the wood for trees on climate change ”, November 14). Why are we supporting the fossil fuel industry in the midst of a climate crisis? It would make more sense to shift that money to support the adoption of electric vehicles by making them cheaper for the average family to buy. This approach would have the subsidiary advantage of pushing our heavy industries which benefit from the rebate to use renewable energies. At present, the subsidy is delaying this inevitable movement. Larry Woldenberg, Forest Lodge

Cancel vulture

There is no revival without anger (“Don’t Mention The War: Why John Cleese Canceled Himself,” November 14). Alicia Dawson, Balmain

Flight in the light of day?

Your article suggests that changing the time can adversely affect our circadian rhythm (“Seeing the light: Why daylight saving time might be bad for you,” November 14). Since local time is based on the daily passage of our sun, we could halve this potential health risk by having only half an hour of daylight saving time per day instead of l full hour. For our wide band of longitude in our time zone, we could make it a permanent change and forget the annual spring back and forth. Micheal Traynor, Bellambi

Comments are closed.